English language education

Knowing English language is important and useful in daily life. Although some people propose that language education should not be English, I agrue that it be. To begin with, the fact is that English is one of the most widely used languages in the world. It has a certain amount of dominance over other planetary languages because lots of countries of the world were once colonies of England and these countries still contain schooling in English. For example, Enlish is one of the common language in India or Hong Kong. Second, even in Internet a large amount of information is in English. In fact, if you want to travel, do business with foreigners or take place in world-wide projects, you are supposed to use English. However, opponents may argue that why one should be educated in foreign language while there is their own native language. They have point but it is not strong enough. As an answer it must be very predictable why world's best universites use English as a language education even if there is their own language. To sum up, because English language is one of the global language, language of education must be in English.

Forbidden sites

Daily life can not be imagined without Internet. It is impossible to find one not using Internet. However, while Internet is used for entertaining, searching and communication, it is also used in bad ways. As there are very useful websites, there are also harmful and dangerous websites. In fact, bad websites may affect some badly, especially children and adults who are not mature enough to recognize what is good and bad. That is why government should find out some solutions and ban the sites which are dangerous enough to affect our children and adults badly, which means to affect the future badly.

Euthanasia

Euthanasia has always been a controversial issue. Although some people propose that euthanasia should be illegal, I agrue that it be legal. First reason is that the costs of medicines and hospital rooms are very high. And patient's family is responsible for these expences. Second, family suffers. The family is supposed to spend time and care for the special needs of their loved one; and, it would be very difficult to watch a loved one suffering. Third, the patients have no chance of recovery unless there is a miracle. They will not have normal lives as they had before and must be kept alive by support machines. The machines would be used for one to breathe and to feed. Unfortunately, they will not get normal as he or she was. Opponents may claim that it is much more worse not to see one than in a condition of being kept alive by the help of machines. They have point but it is not strong enough. One would not want their family to suffer, even if he or she was in a condition of being kept alive by machines. To sum up, I argue that euthanasia should be legal.

Free downloading

A lot of people download movies, mp3s and software programs for free rather than buying. Although proponents argue that downloading movies, mp3s and software programs from Net for free should be considered legal, I argue that it be considered illegal. First, people release movies in the intention of earning money; and while one profits without paying money, the other gains nothing at all. Second, In order to release them people spend not only their money but also their effort and time. In fact, in order to release just movie people spend more than one year working on it. Opponents propose that it is too expensive for one to buy the original forms. That's why free downloading should be legal. However they are totally wrong. I ask proponents of free downloading to think about people spending a lot of money to release movies, mp3s and software programs; and, if you download for free, there will not be any difference rather than stealing. To sum up free downloading should be considered illegal.

Free downloading outline

Thesis statement: Although proponents argue that downloading movies, mp3s and software programs from Net for free should be considered legal, I argue that it be considered illegal.

Reason 1: People release movies, mp3s and software progpams in the intention of earning money; and while one profits, the other gains nothing at all.

Reason 2: In order to release them people spend not only their money but also their effort and time. In fact, in order to release just movie people spend more than one year working on it.

Reason against: Opponents propose that it is too expensive for one to buy the original forms. That's why free downloading should be legal.

Refutation: They are totally wrong. I ask proponents of free downloading to think about people spending a lot of money to release movies, mp3s and software programs; and, if one downloads for free, there will not be any difference rather than stealing.

Online education or face to face education

Now without going to school and attending to classes one have an opportunity to be educated by means of online education. While proponents of online education propose that the online education is as efficient as face to face education, I argue that it is not. First, because Net involves so many attractive websites, it is difficult to keep concentration without entering to other sites. In fact, students consider studieng boring and Net involving everything may disable one to keep concentration. Second, one can not discuss the issues that are difficult or not clear enough to understand. In fact, one may ask to instructor and find out solution for problems. Third, online education is unhealthy for one's eyes. Because in online education the lessons should be followed over Tv or Net. However, opponents of face to face education claim that it may be difficult for one to attend to the lessons especially when he or she is ill; and, there is only one easiest option to have education, which is online education. They have point but it is not strong enough because it won't be as useful as face to face education. To sum up, although opponents have point, I argue that face to face education is more efficient than online education.

Outline

Thesis statement: While proponents of online education propose that online education is as efficient as face to face education, I argue that it is not as efficient as face to face education.

Reason 1: Because Net involves so many attractive websites it is difficult to keep concentration without entering to other sites.

Reason 2: One can not discuss the issues that are difficult or not enough clear to understand for one. In fact, one may ask to instructor and find out solution for problems.

Reason 3: Online education is unhealthy for ones eyes. Because in online education the lessons should be followed over TV or Net.

Reason against: One may be educated without attending to classes especially when one is ill.

Refutation: They have a point but it is not strong enough because it won't be as useful as face to face education.